I’ve been following the COVID-19 story closely and have written previous posts about how different jurisdictions have been addressing the new coronavirus.
The Munk School of Public Affairs event broadened my understanding of what COVID-19 entails.
For that reason I’ve written the current post featuring a link (please see above) to the YouTube recording of the Zoom event.
An online blurb for the event noted:
Trust between the people and their governments, law enforcement agencies or branches of authority isn’t always ironclad. But usually, skepticism bears little impact on our ability to live well. How do politics and perception shape a global pandemic? Can a lack of trust have an impact on public health?
As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, so does the information shared by authorities. Leaders at all levels have shifted from downplaying the severity of the virus to imposing lockdowns, and in some cases, have fallen ill themselves. Public health guidance on wearing masks and gathering in public continues to change. In some countries, there is a stark lack of government consensus, which is directly impacting health outcomes. As conspiracy theorists and disinformation runs rampant while experts conflict on how to proceed, who can we trust? And what are the consequences if we lose faith in the institutions meant to keep us safe?
Please submit your questions in advance to email@example.com. A webinar link will be emailed to you upon registration.
Former CBC Chief Correspondent and Distinguished Fellow, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy
Professor, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy and Department of Political Science
Associate Professor, Asian Institute at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy and Department of Political Science
Dr. David Fisman
Professor and Faculty Division Head of Epidemiology at Dalla Lana School of Public Health