The history of land-use planning in Regent Park reflects the worldwide history of land-use planning

Regent Park – Feb. 1, 2013. Jaan Pill photo

A May 16, 2018 CBC article is entitled: “Decision quietly made by Toronto Community Housing sparks concern in Regent Park: TCH acknowledges it should have told residents sooner new developers could be moving in.”

The concluding paragraphs of the article read:

With the agency committing to be more transparent with its decisions, resident Michelle Basha is cautiously optimistic.

Map showing the planned phases of redevelopment of Regent Park, image courtesy of TCHC. This image has been downloaded from http://urbantoronto.ca/news/2012/09/tchc-and-daniels-unveil-plans-phase-three-regent-park-revitalization

“Based on the fact that we are here because we’ve been left in the dark, it’s wait to see,” Basha said.

Until then, she and other residents say they plan to hold the agency to account, to make sure it follows through on its promises.

“Right now it’s just air in the wind.”

[End]

Previous posts about Regent Park

Click here for previous posts about Regent Park >

I’ve been writing about the history of land-use planning in Regent Park and elsewhere for some time.

Regent Park Aquatic Centre – Feb. 1, 2013. Jaan Pill photo

Within the larger picture of the history of land-use planning in Toronto and elsewhere in the world over the past century, the Regent Park story serves as an entry point, by which evolving narratives related to housing, social class, and power structures in society can be understood, as noted at previous posts:

Framing Regent Park: The National Film Board and the construction of “outcast spaces” in the inner city – 1953 & 1994

Ken Greenberg speaks of lessons from pioneering global cities

Early National Film Board depictions of Regent Park

The role that institutions such as the National Film Board have played over the past half-century, in the days when I imagine the NFB did indeed have a measure of influence on what people thought, about any number of topics, is of particular interest to me.

The NFB documentary film format, as it emerged during the Second World War and postwar years, positioned itself as dealing with what could be described as everyday life – which what could be described as everyday reality, that is.

The construction of that reality, in the viewer’s mind, however, quite consistently involved rhetorical framing that led to the construction of perceptions that accorded more closely with the viewpoint of NFB producers than it did with the actual, moment-to-moment, everyday realities of individuals and families depicted in such films.

The National Film Board approach to filmmaking that is evident, in particular in an early documentary about Regent Park as described at an earlier post, echoes themes that are also at the heart of the conceptual framework, adopted by the original Walt Disney animators, as described at still another previous post:

Mental imagery, as Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston explain in their 1978 talk in Toronto, played a key role in the portrayal of Walt Disney’s animated characters

Differences in history of land-use planning: Mississauga compared to Toronto

The history – and attendant culture – of land-use planning differs markedly from one municipality to another. The difference between Mississauga and Toronto with regard to this topic, by way of example, is among the most remarkable things that I have learned during my twenty-one-year stay in south Etobicoke (as I have mentioned elsewhere, we are moving out soon).

By way of conclusion, regarding the role that citizens play, in different municipalities in Ontario, if you want to see a close match between rhetoric and reality, as it relates to actual (actual as opposed to rhetorical) citizen participation in land-use planning, look to Mississauga:

Cultural differences between Toronto and Mississauga are evident in “feeling in the air” at land-use planning meetings

March 11, 2018 Toronto Star article about Humber Bay Shores brings to mind that Mississauga and Toronto have differing cultures of waterfront development

Mississauga’s vision: A city where the waterfront is beautiful, transit is seamless, and residents celebrate and share their cultures

Province announces sale of OPG lands for Mississauga’s waterfront redevelopment: OPG will transfer 67 acres of land to the City of Mississauga

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter Captcha Here : *

Reload Image