Class EA study for improvements to the QEW. This blog post includes updated background information.
David Juliusson has informed us of a meeting regarding the Dec. 8, 2012 community meeting regarding the Class EA (Environmental Assessment) study for improvements to the QEW.
David Switzer (see below in this blog post) has offered some additional background, with a focus on the Etobicoke Creek Trail extension, as has CCFEW, as well as Dawn McKinnon, Environmental Planner, writing on behalf of the QEW Dixie EA project team.
Dawn McKinnon notes that the Etobicoke Creek Trail extension and the Class EA study for improvements to the QEW between Evans Avenue and Cawthra Road are, in fact, independent of each other.
Here is the official notice about the community workshop on Sat., Dec. 8, 2012 regarding the Class EA study for improvements to the QEW:
From Ecoplans – QEW Improvements Workshop 1
Excerpts from official notice (click on link above to access the notice)
Below are excerpts from the above-noted PDF file:
Message from Ecoplans
Website: Ecoplans
November 13, 2012
RE: QEW Improvements from Evans Avenue to Cawthra Road
Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Study Notice of Community Workshop #1 GWP 09-20003
The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has retained McCormick Rankin (MRC), a member of MMM Group Limited, to undertake a Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment Study to examine the rehabilitation and improvement needs for the Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) from Evans Avenue to Cawthra Road. The study limits extend approximately 3.5 km through the City of Mississauga (Region of Peel) and the City of Toronto.
As part of the study’s consultation program, three community workshops will be held at key stages to augment the information obtained at the Public Information Centres (PICs) and to assist the Project Team by providing information and input relative to community interests and study issues. The first PIC was held on October 11th, 2012 and the project team would like to invite you to participate in the first community workshop being held for this project.
The community workshop has been scheduled to take place on Saturday December 8, 2012 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The venue will be confirmed at a later date. The purpose of the workshop will be to obtain input on community issues, the opportunities within the study area related to the bridges and highway, and the alternatives that were presented at PIC #1.
We respectfully request your RSVP by Monday, November 26, 2012 in order to confirm attendance numbers so that we may plan the best facilitation of the workshop. Venue location information and an agenda will be forwarded to you in advance of the workshop.
Please confirm your attendance by contacting the undersigned by e-mail: dmckinnon@ecoplans.com or telephone: 905-823-4988, Ext. 1283.
For additional details about the Study, please visit the Study website.
We thank you for your continued involvement in the Study and look forward to seeing you on December 8th.
Background regarding the multi-use trail along Etobicoke Creek
I’ve received a comment from David Switzer of Long Branch about the upcoming MTO meeting, outlined above. The gist of the comment, about a topic that I’m not familiar with, is as follows:
David Switzer remarks that “the meeting will not be about the Etobicoke Creek Trail extension and will be focused on the main purpose of the project which is bridge maintenance and traffic flow. The cycle trail is only indicated as a “proposed off-road route” on a PIC exhibit titled “Existing Conditions – Social and Cultural”.
“The cycling path extension has many similarities to the project of naturalization of the mouth of the Etobicoke Creek. The cancelation of the TRCA plan to naturalize the mouth of the Etobicoke Creek happened without community consultation after more than a decade of community involvement and a million dollars given to TRCA for the project. The Cycle Path Extension also came about with funding…this time from the developer of the condo high rises in Sherway Gardens in the form of a Section 37 deal. Just as the naturalization project may have been held up by an infrastructure project, Mississauga’s water pipe… In the case of the cycle path by MTO.
Request for information
I’ve asked a number of people if the history that David Switzer describes is accurate, in terms of their understanding of the story. David David would like to ensure that he has the correct understanding of the history.
Background information from Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (CCFEW)
As I understand, Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (CCFEW) have/has been following the Etobicoke Valley Trail’s lack of progress for some time.
As I understand, the money to build it came from the Sherway condos – plans were well under way when MTC said that because of planned reconstruction of the QEW bridge they would not approve the trail.
CCFEW has, as I understood, responded that improvements to the trail should proceed as it would be years before the bridge was completed. That is: They had the money, do it now and it would be cheaper to repair it if necessary than to wait and construct it five years from now. It may be the case, as I understand, that Councillor Milczyn has been helping — it is in his ward.
Background information from Dawn McKinnon, Environmental Planner, on behalf of the QEW Dixie EA project team
The second response that I’ve received reads as follows. I have received permission from Dawn McKinnon to post it:
Nov. 29, 2012
Hello Mr. Pill, Thank you for your interest in the Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study for improvements to the QEW from Evans Avenue to Cawthra Road.
Please note that as part of this study, rehabilitation, safety and operational needs are being identified, alternatives are being developed, and transportation improvements within the study limits will ultimately be recommended. As such, improvements to the Dixie Road interchange are being considered, as are bridge rehabilitation and/or replacement opportunities.
The purpose of Community Workshop #1 will be to obtain input on community issues, the opportunities within the study area related to the bridges and highway, and the alternatives that were shown at Public Information Centre (PIC) #1, which was held on October 11, 2012. Mr. Switzer is correct in his understanding that the workshop will not focus on the Etobicoke Creek Trail extension, as the TRCA trail is independent of this Class EA Study. TRCA is included as a stakeholder as part of this study, although the history related to previous and proposed undertakings by TRCA is best confirmed directly with TRCA.
Over the next few months, the project team will review the comments received from the community, agencies and other stakeholders at PIC #1 and Community Workshop #1, refine the alternatives, and commence the evaluation of alternatives. The alternatives evaluation process and the recommended alternative will be presented for review and comment at the second PIC, currently planned for the Summer of 2013. The recommended alternative will then be further refined and the preferred alternative will be presented at the third and final PIC, toward the end of the study.
Kind regards,
Dawn McKinnon Environmental Planner
On behalf of the QEW Dixie EA project team
Ecoplans | A member of MMM Group
2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 280
Mississauga, ON L5K 2P8
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!