Ossington Community Association has posted some great tweets regarding the Development Permit System
Updates
I’ve received a comment that posting a series of tweets does not make for fun reading, for a site visitor. That’s a good point – I’ll find another way to communicate information related to Twitter accounts that I follow. I much appreciate comments about the contents and format of the site.
I’ve also received a comment that the links at this site aren’t easy to see. I’m working with Walden Design to figure out how to address this. We want a link that is easy to see, and at the same time we don’t want the page to look cut up, when there are a lot of links. Again, feedback from site visitors about such topics is much appreciated.
[End of updates]
The following tweets are from the Ossington Community Association Twitter feed. The text includes links to a CORRA discussion paper and a City of Toronto “ResetTO” document. These documents – and the related discussion – are well worth reading. They’re also well worth commenting upon.
-
ossington community @OssingtonCA 10m
.@fellowplanner @jen_keesmaat @CityPlanTO This is a fantastic paper, Bob; accurate & succinct. It deserves to be heavily publicized.
-
Retweeted by ossington community
-
.@fellowplanner @jen_keesmaat @CityPlanTO Applicants retain the right to appeal specific DPS decisions. See O. Reg 608/06 s.12.
-
.@joel_TO @CityPlanTO That’s the hype, but arguably DPS outcomes r *less* certain. See S3.3 of CORRA paper: http://bit.ly/corra-dps #TOPoli
-
.@fellowplanner @jen_keesmaat What this really means is that it takes the public and their representatives out of planning. #TOPoli
-
.@TransToronto @jen_keesmaat @karensun The public rights-removing DPS is not the only or best way to accomplish this.
-
.@karensun Don’t believe the hype. These reqs can be built into current area-based processes. DPS removes public rights to consult, appeal.
-
.@jamesmatthews58 Don’t believe the hype. Post-Development Permit System, no public consult, appeal. Not so w/ present area planning tools.
-
Retweeted by ossington community
@jen_keesmaat @jamesmatthews58 Say the DPS agrees 6-10 storeys. Developer wants 8 but CP says 7. Developer appeals, neighbours can’t. +risk!
-
.@jen_keesmaat In subsuming minor variances, DPS by-laws will typically automatically “up-zone” areas to which they apply. #TOPoli
-
.@donnelly_b CORRA (Confederation of Residents & Ratepayer Assoc) would apprec if you would read their paper on DPS: http://bit.ly/corra-dps
-
.@fellowplanner @jen_keesmaat It does mention this, but only indirectly. Characteristic of @CityPlanTO comm on DPS to downplay this.
-
Retweeted by ossington community
@jen_keesmaat Great idea! Primer on the Develop Permit S.Should also mention no appeals to OMB by 3rd party. http://www1.toronto.ca/City%20Of%20Toronto/City%20Planning/Zoning%20&%20Environment/Files/pdf/R/Reset_TO_Toolkit_2014.pdf … #TOpoli”
-
.@to_innersuburbs @jen_keesmaat Sadly, it’s the opposite. After DPS by-law is passed, no community consult, no 3rd party appeals, for 5yrs.
-
.@jen_keesmaat TO has proactive area policies (Area Plans & Official Plan Amndmnts) that don’t remove rights of public consult, appeal.
-
.@jen_keesmaat The City piece paints Development Permit System in rosy hues. For clear concerns, see CORRA’s paper: http://bit.ly/corra-dps
-
.@reneeswilliams CORRA would appreciate it if you would also look at our discussion paper on the DPS, avail here: http://bit.ly/corra-dps
-
Retweeted by ossington community
@jen_keesmaat @reneeswilliams Why omit the fact that only developers retain right of appeal? Neighbours are locked-out. Are u being fair?
-
.@jen_keesmaat @reneeswilliams False. True that no appeals to change by-law on site basis. But dvlprs CAN appeal site-based decisions.
-
Retweeted by ossington community
Really enjoyed lunch @Union_Resto in @OssingtonCA. @edibleTORONTO and I shared a polenta dish and lasagna. We will be back!
-
@Reposadist Thanks for following—big fans of your excellent libations & music. Looking forward to floating jazz strains this summer…
-
Wanta read a super-law-substantiated tract on Development Permit System? Of course you do. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9etoTst5TwXNmhQcmxrOXU5TlI0bWFsLXpLaTZZVjdxOENF/edit … #TOPoli
-
.@jen_keesmaat There’s an incredible myth in TO that a pro-growth public consult+rights-removing planning process is teh awesome! #TOPoli
-
.@kimplans Good ref. Here’s another, laying out the actual Official Plan Amendment policies: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64067.pdf …
-
Apropos? @CityPlanTO site for Whatever-with-existing-zoning “Reset TO” Development Permit System info has probs: https://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=3b2cd9e27ac93410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD&vgnextfmt=default …
-
.@Sean_Hertel Good ref. Here’s another, to law on Development Permit Systems, O. Reg 608/06: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_060608_e.htm … #TOplan #TOPoli
-
Save Fri, May 2 for OCA Dance Party w/ Celeb Live Auctioneer @m_layton, Cabaret Rm @LOTheatre. Art, meals, Muskoka vacays on the block.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!